Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, M. G., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Evolution and People Decisions, 29(2), 119�126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The place off connection from inside the people mating. Article on General Mindset, 4(2), 186�204.
Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A great. (2002). Sites contradiction reviewed. Log from Public Points, 58(1), 49�74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet sites paradox: A social technology one decreases public engagement and you may emotional better-becoming? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017�1031.
The many benefits of self-confident illusions: Idealization in addition to structure of satisfaction into the personal dating
Kreider, R.Yards., & Areas, J. Yards. (2001). Amount, time, and time of marriage ceremonies and you may divorces. Latest Population Records, 70-80, (Washington, DC: You.S. Census Bureau, 2005).
Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional study out-of intimacy, welfare, and you can relationship: Comparison the new assumptions of triangular principle from love. Emotional Accounts, 90(3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.3.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Impression best regarding creating worse: Public comparisons contained in this intimate matchmaking. Diary away from Character and you can Personal Therapy, 87(1), 80�95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. An effective., & Gailliot, Meters. T. (2009). Log from Personality and Public Therapy, 97(1), 74�87.
Intrasexual vigilance: The brand new implicit cognition regarding intimate competition
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A good., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automated inattention to help you glamorous selection: The fresh new progressed psychology from matchmaking repairs. Evolution and you may Human Conclusion, 29(5), 343�349.
pold, B. Elizabeth. (1981). Sequential studies from dispute and you can accord from inside the distressed and you may nondistressed marital couples. Diary regarding Contacting and Logical Psychology, 49(4), 554�567.
McKenna, K. Y. A great., Eco-friendly, An effective. S., Gleason, M. J. (2002). Matchmaking creation online: What is the larger interest? Record regarding Societal Facts, 58(1), 9�30.
Neff, L. Good., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-testing motives in romantic relationships: A style of international enhancement and specific confirmation. In the P. Noller & J. A good. Feeney (Eds.), Wisdom ents from the examination of couples telecommunications (pp. 32�58). Nyc, NY: Cambridge College or university Push.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the customer-therapist bond from the lens out of attachment concept. Psychotherapy: Principle, Search, Practice, Degree, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). dating polyamorous The new public monitoring system: Increased sensitivity to help you public cues since an adaptive reaction to personal exception. For the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The latest societal outcast: Ostracism, public different, rejection, and you can bullying (pp. 213�226). Ny, NY: Mindset Push.
Enter, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). International and particular relational habits on contact with societal interactions. Log out-of Personality and you will Public Therapy, 80(4), 613�631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. An excellent., Tran, S., ). Connection and you will recommendations seeking to inside personal relationship. Identification and you can Social Therapy Bulletin, 33(3), 422�438.
Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and you can specific connection representations in the adulthood: Can there be a romance?. Journal Off Public And private Relationships, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. Good. (2001)mitment and relationships restoration mechanisms. Into the J. Harvey & An excellent. Wenzel (Eds.), Personal close matchmaking: Restoration and improvement (pp. 87�113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A. D. (2000). Projection truly effect certainly one of partners once the a purpose of brand new resemblance within their mutual skills. Identity And you may Personal Therapy Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Results of salience out of extrinsic advantages to the preference and enjoying. Record out-of Identity and you may Public Psychology, 38(3), 453�460.